Bitligence for Insurance · P&C claims

Atlas and Praxis. Two claims agents, governed at runtime.

Atlas handles inbound FNOL calls. Praxis runs the claim file after intake. Every decision arrives in your adjuster’s inbox with the recommendation, the priors, the confidence score, and the audit trail — and every action passes the same governance gate as the rest of Bitligence.

FNOL → filetwo agents, one trail
≥95%field completion at intake
5-axispriority on every decision
signedevery action, replayable

Live product · Assurance Observatory — agents runtime

The agents

One handles the call. One handles the file.

Both are agentic services that read claim state through your API, reason over it, and write decisions, reserves, and tasks back through the same path. Your platform stays the system of record.

Voice intake · FNOL

Atlas

Atlas answers inbound FNOL calls and captures a structured claim file during the call — submitting it to your core system before the caller hangs up.

  • ≥95% field completion at first contact
  • Verbal confirmation on medium-confidence fields
  • Full-call escalation to a human when uncertain
File handling · with trace

Praxis

Praxis consumes claim events, runs the file-handling functions per event, scores every surfaced decision, and writes decisions back through your API.

  • Runs the file overnight
  • Recommendation + priors + audit trail attached
  • High-stakes work never auto-executes
Atlas · live intake

A first notice of loss, captured during the call.

Atlas answers, captures every field while the caller talks, verifies the policy mid-conversation, and hands a complete claim file to Praxis — no callback. The call below plays a representative intake.

Atlas · voice intakelive · structured FNOL captured during the call
Book a demo to hear Atlas live →
Simulated call · preview

Sample transcript plays here — Atlas captures the loss notice as the conversation happens.

Structured file · auto-populated
Caller
Injury
Policy
Loss
Police
Routing
The oversight surface

Every agent action lands in an inbox.

Praxis surfaces every decision that needs a human — scored on five weighted axes, with the recommendation drafted, the cost of waiting quantified, and the trace attached. Your adjuster decides; the audit log records.

Oversight inbox · Sarah Chen3 items need a human
Praxis connected
92critical

GA school-bus, $5M policy-limits demand — tender recommended

Plaintiff counsel has 3 priors, all settled within window. Decline risk: ~$3M extracontractual.

Bad-faithTime-boundedKnown$5.0M stake·Praxis · counsel-pattern model
88critical

TX 5-day acknowledgment due in 4 hr — letter drafted

Standard rear-end / clear liability. TX-DOI compliant template populated. One-tap send.

StatutoryBreaches-todayKnown$1.5k stake·Praxis · statutory-clock service
76high

FL restaurant claimant — 3 prior ISO matches flagged

Same claimant, same loss type, 3 different insureds in 18 months. Pattern score 0.84.

SIUTime-boundedKnown$19k stake·Praxis · ISO ClaimSearch integration
Click any item and Praxis hands you the full recommendation, dimensions, and trace.Open inbox →
How every row is scored

Five weighted axes, set by the carrier.

Deadline · 35%

breaches-today · time-bounded · async · historical

Risk · 30%

bad-faith · statutory · SIU · litigation · reserve · routine

Reversibility · 20%

irreversible · effortful · easy · done

Source · 10%

unknown · sub-agent · external · known

Type · 5%

authorization · escalation · anomaly · confirmation

Agentic governance

After enough agreement, categories become rules.

Day one, every decision flows through the inbox. The system tracks where the agents and the adjuster agree, on which categories, with what confidence. When agreement crosses ≥95% over ≥20 samples, it surfaces the rule. Your adjuster approves it once — and that category stops hitting the inbox.

The rule graduates into a signed, versioned policy (shadow first, then active on promotion). Over time the inbox holds only novel or high-stakes work, and your adjuster’s time shifts from approving claims to approving the rules that govern categories of them.

Watch

Observe decisions

Every agent recommendation and adjuster decision is recorded with confidence and reason.

Learn

Track agreement

Agreement is tracked per category — ≥95% over ≥20 samples surfaces a candidate rule.

Graduate

Approve once

One signed attestation promotes the rule to a versioned policy; the category leaves the inbox.

Enforce

Shadow → active

Policies run in shadow first (log, don’t block), then enforce on promotion — ~8ms in the path.

Integration

Drops into the claim platform you already run.

Atlas and Praxis integrate with Guidewire ClaimCenter, Duck Creek Claims, or a homegrown core. Your platform stays the system of record; the agents read claim state through your API and write decisions, reserves, and tasks back through the same path.

Guidewire ClaimCenter

Read claim state and write back through the standard integration path.

Duck Creek Claims

Same read/reason/write loop against your existing configuration.

Homegrown core

Any system with an API — the agents adapt to your model, not the reverse.

Your boundary

Run in your cloud, VPC, on-prem, or air-gapped. Data never leaves your perimeter.

Compliance

Built for the regulatory reality of claims.

Aligned toNAIC AI Model BulletinNYDFS CL-1Colorado SB21-169Signed audit trail

NAIC AI Model Bulletin (2023)

Governance + third-party oversight in the default config.

NYDFS Circular Letter No. 1 (2019)

External-data documentation + disparate-impact analysis in the audit trail.

Colorado SB21-169 (2021)

Fairness-testing patterns applied across personal and commercial lines.

The 48-hour diagnostic

Send a representative week of your FNOL records.

Your data, your numbers, one page — back to you in 48 hours, with a 30-minute call after.